Saying I agree with the premise of your article, which I do, what pray tell do you deem “the real news?” Is it how the FBI had the dossier last summer from a credible spy but only went public with an investigation into Clinton, not Trump? Because even if the dossier were completely false, the fact that a credible spy brought it to the FBI last summer should have triggered an investigation into Trump. Did it? If so, how is it possible that Comey was all over the news about Clinton’s investigation, but said nothing about Trump’s? It was against Justice Department policy to begin with. Or if there was no investigation, why on Earth not? To this day, James Clapper has stated that the dossier has not been judged by the Intelligence Community yet:
We also discussed the private security company document, which was widely circulated in recent months among the media, members of Congress and Congressional staff even before the IC became aware of it. I emphasized that this document is not a U.S. Intelligence Community product and that I do not believe the leaks came from within the IC. The IC has not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions. However, part of our obligation is to ensure that policymakers are provided with the fullest possible picture of any matters that might affect national security.
All of this relates to how Russia tampered with our election. We currently have an installed President courtesy of manipulation by a foreign dictator. Is this just distraction for you? Is that just jiggy with you? Or is it an ignored story?